Withdrawal documents: build the checklist for your request
Separate identity, address and payment-ownership requests, check the stated requirements and respond to a rejection without sending unnecessary records.
Use the exact authenticated request to prepare documents. If something remains unresolved, keep a clear chronology and follow the route that applies to the issue.
Check what was requested, what was accepted and what still needs an explanation.
Separate identity, address and payment-ownership requests, check the stated requirements and respond to a rejection without sending unnecessary records.
A file uploaded today can show an expired document. Those dates answer different questions.
The date a statement was downloaded is not necessarily the statement's issue date or the period it covers.
Different spellings or a changed surname need an explanation through the recipient's process, not an altered document.
Distinguish a blurry or cropped image from an ineligible document, then make a focused correction and preserve the upload record.
A file extension, file type and upload limit are separate constraints. Changing a filename does not convert the document.
Proving who you are and showing who owns a payment account are related but different requests.
A request for more evidence should identify a purpose and a submission route; a vague message is a reason to clarify first.
A convincing message is not enough to establish where sensitive documents should go.
A repeated request may concern a different purpose, a rejected file or a missing receipt. Establish which before resubmitting.
Build a dated record, protect private details and distinguish support from formal escalation.
Build a local draft for a first query, unanswered follow-up or unresolved response. Keep dates, status and requested action clear without entering personal information.
A useful timeline distinguishes observed facts from estimates and labels every time zone.
A contact log should show what was asked, which channel was used and what response was received, without unnecessary personal information.
A number copied without its heading, qualifications or date can misrepresent the policy it came from.
A public explanation usually needs a timeline and issue description, not a passport, full statement or account credential.
Check the product, operator process and scope of iGO review before escalating an unresolved withdrawal, document or account dispute.
When two applicable sources disagree, choosing the more convenient one is not verification.
A correction request is strongest when it identifies the exact claim, an applicable source and the proposed factual change.
A resolution should state what was confirmed, what changed and which questions remain unanswered.
Find official Ontario support and self-exclusion information.